• Home
  • LUX ETERNA RECORDS
  • About Us
  • Contact

  • Culture
    • Music
    • Critical Condition
    • Sex & Mayhem Report
    • Metal!
    • Nostalgia
    • LUX ETERNA RECORDS
    • Live Music
    • Pop?
    • Avant-Garde!
    • Soul!
    • Records
    • The Biz
    • Rock?
    • Recording
    • The Contrarian
  • Media
    • Series of Tubes
    • Television
    • Comics
    • Conspiracy!
    • Poetry
    • Art
    • Journalism
    • Literature
    • Film
    • GameDrain
    • Copyright—Fight—Left
    • Video
  • Metaphysics
    • Behavioral Science
    • Buddhism
    • Atheism
    • Derangement
    • H+
    • Lovecraft Haiku
    • Magick
    • Mysticism
    • Sci-Fi
    • Religion
    • Paranormal
    • Eeeeevill!
    • We’re All Gonna Die!
    • Apocalypse!
  • Politics
    • America
    • Foreign Affairs
    • Current Events
    • Ethics
    • Our Sad Society
    • Intelligence?
    • History
    • Economics
    • Scam-tastic!
  • Allsorts
    • Technology
    • Complaining
    • Science
    • Too Fucking Cute
    • Podcasts
    • Linkdumps
    • Absolutely Unrelated
    • LOLZ
    • Drink
    • Vague Announcements
    • Travel
    • Teh Hotnezz
  • Scribes
    • Carrie Stanziola
    • Bill Simmon
    • Dr. Agamemnon Cox
    • Casey Rae-Hunter
    • Chris Parizo
    • Wes Covey
    • Arthur Leon Adams III
    • Neil Cleary
    • Molly Hodgdon
    • Cartomancer Carolyn

Final Radiohead Post. Ever. Probably.

Posted by: Casey Rae-Hunter    Tags:      Posted date:  October 11, 2007  |  6 Comments

Sick of all the instant (and over) analysis of Radiohead‘s In Rainbows? Too bad, ’cause you really need to read the great Charlie Wilmoth‘s take over at Dusted. He appears to like the album less than I do, but man, what insight.

One thing in particular about which we disagree is Radiohead’s aesthetic detachedness. Wilmoth seems to regard the band’s creative arc as a blase waltz into namby-pamby nihilism, whereas I hear glimmers of hope and even transcendence in their themes of self-surrender.

He also believes that they’ll never be able to "jam" as well as their krautrock forbears, so they ought not to try. Well, I challenge anyone to listen to "The National Anthem" from Kid A and argue against its lockgroove awesomeness.

OK, I promise that’s it for Radiohead and The Contrarian for a long, long while. Unless they play a show in my apartment, that is.


    Share This
About the author
Casey Rae-Hunter
Casey Rae-Hunter is a musician, public policy wonk and the editor/publisher of The Contrarian Media. An in-demand speaker, he gives frequent talks at conferences and campuses on issues at the intersection of creativity, technology, policy and law, and is a go-to source for major media outlets from NPR to the New York Times. Casey works alongside leaders in the music, arts and performance sectors to bolster understanding of and engagement in key policy and technology issues, and has written dozens of articles on the impact of technology on the creative community. Casey is an adjunct professor at Georgetown University and the Deputy Director for Future of Music Coalition. He also serves on the Board of Directors of the Media & Democracy Coalition and the National Alliance for Media Arts and Culture. The Contrarian does not necessarily represent the views of the organizations to which he belongs.




6 Comments for Final Radiohead Post. Ever. Probably.

jay

Sorry, but I think Charlie’s review was some of the worst writing on music that I’ve ever read–it just seemed like a stream of consciousness diatribe where he didn’t even bother to review & edit the obvious contradictions in his text. The fact that he doesn’t think Radiohead is writing “songs” anymore is just outright laughable–the songs on “In Rainbows” have just as distinct and definable structures as anything on “The Bends” or “Ok Computer”.

I have read a lot of negative reviews on this album, and even though I don’t agree with most, I’ve been at least able to respect the viewpoints expressed. Wilmouth’s “review” was just a naive, half-assed attempt at playing the Devil’s Advocate.

casey

I disagree. I think his points are well thought out and articulated. He actually tells you why his expectations of/for Radiohead run counter to what they’ve been up to lately. At some points in its recent history, the band has attempted to “erase themselves,” as Charlie puts it and, while I agree with you that In Rainbows features actual songs, I also understand why someone would comment on the band’s lack of commitment to either rock or be more forward in experimentation.

I personally don’t see it as an either-or scenario, and really love the new album. Best since Kid A, even (although “Pyramid Song” alone is enough to make Amnesiac worthwhile.) Each and every one of Wilmoth’s opinions are valid from a certain perspective. He’s rarely contradictory for it’s own sake — just read his Feist review (which you’ll probably disagree with, too!) for another example. He calls it like he sees it, in a broad context and clearly, which I admire.

I’m sure this won’t taint your own personal enjoyment of the album, either way!

Charlie

Casey: I agree, “The National Anthem” is pretty awesome. I don’t think they’ve done nearly so well with the semi-improvised-sounding stuff since then, though.

Jay: Actually, when I was writing the review, I went and read some lyrics from the album and was surprised how many there were. Maybe it’s more accurate to say that they don’t sound comfortable with their songs anymore. But I think there’s still too much reliance on catchphrases and melismatic mumblings.

Charlie

By the way, Jay, you’re entitled to your opinion, but I really take issue with your contention that the song structures on In Rainbows are just as “distinct” as those of The Bends. Really, you hear the songs on In Rainbows as verses bursting into choruses, and so on? It seems really obvious to me that a sort of haziness has become a big part of their sound since then… do you disagree?

jay

I don’t think their song structures are any less formal than they were on “Ok Computer” and several songs on “The Bends”. And even if they’re not, who cares? If you only appreciate Radiohead for being a “structured rock band”, then you’re completely missing the point. They haven’t been that way since Pablo Honey. If you’re expecting Radiohead to turn into Coldplay, I wouldn’t hold your breath. Because, no, that is not at all what they “do best”.

So, yes, we’ll agree to disagree. Plain and simple, I think it’s an incredibly weak and shortsighted review.

casey

Basically, I think folks like Charlie feel that the band has lost some of their vitality by neither commiting to explosivo rock nor the experimentalism hinted at on Kid A. Many have the similar complaints about Wilco.

But where Charlie hears a band uncomfortable with itself, I’m hearing the opposite — they sound more confident and relaxed than they ever have. Which, of course, does sap some of the tension. But you can’t be angry and aliented forever. Well, you can pretend to be, but that usually comes across even worse.

I take issue less with the argument of opinion (most of these points are valid one way or another) and more with the critique of Charlie’s writing, which, to me is as clear as a bell and not really even all that provocative. Dude’s a pretty rational guy, as borne out by his scads of reviews over the years.

I have my opinions of the album (really fucking like it), but I appreciate how Charlie’s peice made me reflect and consider the damn thing from another angle. Which is what good writing should do. If it didn’t work for you, Jay, that’s fine, too.






Wanna say something?





  Cancel Reply

« Random Mutations.
I Lied! Radiohead, from a Buddhist Perspective. »
  • Heroes and Villains

    • Genomicon
    • Astral Spit
    • Norton Analog
    • Garamania!
    • Perfect Day Media
    • Blog-Sothoth
    • Autistic in the District
    • Charles Stross
    • TheContrarianMusic.com
    • CASH Music
    • OMNIL
    • Bradley’s Almanac
    • Candleblog
    • Diabologue
    • FlawedArt
    • Future of Music Coalition
    • J. Cole
    • Liquid Sunshine
    • Pure Pop Records
    • Undead Molly
    • Sentient Developments
  • Buck Dharma

    • Hardcore Zen
    • The Buddhist Blog
    • Tricycle Blog
    • Shambhala Sun Space
    • Progressive Buddhism
    • Buddhist Geeks
  • Careful!

    • Erik Davis/Techgnosis
    • Austin Osman Spare Archive
    • Disinformation
    • Greylodge Occult Review
    • IOT North America
    • Skeptic Magazine
    • The Burning Taper
    • The Gnosis Archive
    • R.A. Wilson
    • Thelema
    • Purging Talon
    • Reality Sandwich
    • Guruphiliac
    • The Lovecraft News Network
    • The Daily Grail
    • Hermetic.com
    • What Thou Wilt
  • Reads

    • Zen Twist
    • The Atlantic
    • The Daily Dish
    • Accelerating Future
    • Washington Monthly
    • Wired: Epicenter
    • Wired: The Underwire
    • Washington City Paper
    • StreetTech
    • Black Plastic Bag
    • The Eyeless Owl
    • T.M. Camp
    • FingertipsMusic
    • Dusted Magazine



 

 
No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public. ~ H.L.Mencken