OMG! Did you hear? Some librul blogger totally hates Sarah Palin‘s baby! How do we know? They did a ‘shop of some right wing radio host’s face onto a picture of Palin holding her one-year old! Of course, there is NO WAY that the blogger was trying to convey the inappropriate closeness of the governor with the radio host. It was OBVIOUSLY meant to smear and malign this mentally-challenged child! Below is an excerpt of Palin’s statement to the media (who dutifully regurgitate her regurgitation on to the rest of us):
“Recently we learned of a malicious desecration of a photo of the Governor and baby Trig that has become an iconic representation of a mother’s love for a special needs child,” Palin spokeswoman Meghan Stapelton said in a statement provided to CNN. “The mere idea of someone doctoring the photo of a special needs baby is appalling.”
Now, as Casey pointed out, when anyone uses a photo of a politician’s kid in a negative manner it would be viewed by ANY mother as a provocation. And I would totally feel for Palin if she didn’t trot out her brood at every opportunity to further her own motives. (She also seems to enjoy using her children as human shields in some twisted criticism-deflection strategy.)
Still, this latest brouhaha got me thinking: this could be a great opportunity to drive traffic to The Contrarian site! Since Palin is seemingly incapable of letting anything go and feels the need to gin up outrage at every percieved slight, the Thinnest-Skinned Politician in History is bound to find this post and start whining about how evil it is. The national 24-hour cable news will subsequently run with the ball (because that’s what they do), the mouthbreathers and the three other conservatives will pile on and, the next thing you know, there will be a massive protest of TWELVE PEOPLE outside Contrarian HQ demanding that I be fired. I think that’s called a win-win.
So here goes:
I, MFK, would like to have sex with ONE of Sarah Palin’s offspring. . . in the butt.
Now, I’ll leave it up to her to decide which kid my lewd comment should be directed at. Given her recent media history, it probably won’t be the 18 year-old.
And, to throw more gas on the fire, here’s a photoshop completely unrelated to my previous comment (or is it, Sarah?)