<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Bang Never Happened?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/07/the-big-bang-never-happened/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/07/the-big-bang-never-happened/</link>
	<description>The Toast of Delinquent Intellectuals Everywhere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicolo</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/07/the-big-bang-never-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-4638</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 06:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6284#comment-4638</guid>
		<description>I thought this was really interesting...
I can&#039;t claim to have enough information to warrant a strong opinion on these questions. I will say that science&#039;s ability predict nature is it&#039;s fundamental selling point, so it&#039;s always relevant to ask what can you predict with a theory. There&#039;s something very annoying about so much resting on particles that barley interact with our universe, there maybe a real bottle neck of information because of the real world cost of the apparatus of observation. 
 
more info...
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/astronomy/bigbang.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was really interesting&#8230;<br />
I can&#8217;t claim to have enough information to warrant a strong opinion on these questions. I will say that science&#8217;s ability predict nature is it&#8217;s fundamental selling point, so it&#8217;s always relevant to ask what can you predict with a theory. There&#8217;s something very annoying about so much resting on particles that barley interact with our universe, there maybe a real bottle neck of information because of the real world cost of the apparatus of observation. </p>
<p>more info&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/astronomy/bigbang.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/astronomy/bigbang.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill simmon</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/07/the-big-bang-never-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-4616</link>
		<dc:creator>bill simmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6284#comment-4616</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure Quasar intrinsic redshifts have been debunked. See this wikipedia snip for info on accretion disk energy...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_cosmology#Redshift_periodicity_and_intrinsic_redshifts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure Quasar intrinsic redshifts have been debunked. See this wikipedia snip for info on accretion disk energy&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_cosmology#Redshift_periodicity_and_intrinsic_redshifts" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_cosmology#Redshift_periodicity_and_intrinsic_redshifts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
