<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Contrarian vs. Objectivism, Round II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/</link>
	<description>The Toast of Delinquent Intellectuals Everywhere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:57:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rush Sues Rand?&#160;&#124;&#160;The Contrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-8116</link>
		<dc:creator>Rush Sues Rand?&#160;&#124;&#160;The Contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 21:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6571#comment-8116</guid>
		<description>[...] by another Rand. That&#8217;s right, I&#8217;m talking about that intellectually poisonous witch, Ayn Rand, and her spurious creed, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by another Rand. That&#8217;s right, I&#8217;m talking about that intellectually poisonous witch, Ayn Rand, and her spurious creed, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Most Difficult Argument&#160;&#124;&#160;The Contrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-8056</link>
		<dc:creator>The Most Difficult Argument&#160;&#124;&#160;The Contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 13:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6571#comment-8056</guid>
		<description>[...] know in real life.  Engaging on this issue is quite a bit different than when I bash on Ayn Rand, Comcast or the Tea Party. It&#8217;s a delicate situation with more nuance than most folks are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] know in real life.  Engaging on this issue is quite a bit different than when I bash on Ayn Rand, Comcast or the Tea Party. It&#8217;s a delicate situation with more nuance than most folks are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Man Named Rand&#160;&#124;&#160;The Contrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-7881</link>
		<dc:creator>A Man Named Rand&#160;&#124;&#160;The Contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 21:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6571#comment-7881</guid>
		<description>[...] of all, his name is fucking Rand. Like that intellectually poisonous witch Ayn Rand — perhaps the most corrosive &#8220;thinker&#8221; in modern times. Now, I&#8217;ve heard tell [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of all, his name is fucking Rand. Like that intellectually poisonous witch Ayn Rand — perhaps the most corrosive &#8220;thinker&#8221; in modern times. Now, I&#8217;ve heard tell [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who&#8217;s Your John Galt?&#160;&#124;&#160;The Contrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-5727</link>
		<dc:creator>Who&#8217;s Your John Galt?&#160;&#124;&#160;The Contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6571#comment-5727</guid>
		<description>[...] tumescent novel must be adapted, produced, and directed for the screen by a creator who can match Ayn Rand mind for mind. Who is John Galt? His name is Tommy Wiseau; his achievement is The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tumescent novel must be adapted, produced, and directed for the screen by a creator who can match Ayn Rand mind for mind. Who is John Galt? His name is Tommy Wiseau; his achievement is The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Incredible Employment Opportunity!&#160;&#124;&#160;The Contrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4829</link>
		<dc:creator>Incredible Employment Opportunity!&#160;&#124;&#160;The Contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6571#comment-4829</guid>
		<description>[...] posting. I really want to apply, but I&#8217;m worried that they might stumble across these earlier posts. . . whaddya think? Would they be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posting. I really want to apply, but I&#8217;m worried that they might stumble across these earlier posts. . . whaddya think? Would they be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell W</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4781</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6571#comment-4781</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that you need to go further (for a dismantlement of this so-called &quot;philosophy&quot; than to look at the scene with the security guard in &quot;Atlas Shrugged&quot; and see that Ayn Rand justifies murder.  Once you subscribe to any philosophy (objective acceptance of facts aside, even) you have gone over to the dark side; that is to say, the side that sees your fellow *equal* human beings as less valuable than yourself. That way lies hate, murder, and genocide.  There can be and never will be justification for such stances.  These airheaded celebrities just can&#039;t see logical conclusions.  Frankly, I doubt many have actually read her books.

Personally, though, I&#039;m very disappointed to see Brad Pitt among their company.  In his interviews he has always struck me as a kind of sectarian Buddhist--which I think is an excellent stance.  I hope the magazine is reaching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that you need to go further (for a dismantlement of this so-called &#8220;philosophy&#8221; than to look at the scene with the security guard in &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; and see that Ayn Rand justifies murder.  Once you subscribe to any philosophy (objective acceptance of facts aside, even) you have gone over to the dark side; that is to say, the side that sees your fellow *equal* human beings as less valuable than yourself. That way lies hate, murder, and genocide.  There can be and never will be justification for such stances.  These airheaded celebrities just can&#8217;t see logical conclusions.  Frankly, I doubt many have actually read her books.</p>
<p>Personally, though, I&#8217;m very disappointed to see Brad Pitt among their company.  In his interviews he has always struck me as a kind of sectarian Buddhist&#8211;which I think is an excellent stance.  I hope the magazine is reaching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4756</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6571#comment-4756</guid>
		<description>I assume no safe water, Hilton. But I do find it disturbing that you need to invoke apocalyptic scenarios in order to &quot;prove&quot; the efficacy of your suppositions. Al Queda, anyone?

As an exercise in logicical argumentation, your points are useless to debate due to an a priori assumption that no market is ever free enough of &quot;distortions&quot; for  your individualist utopia to emerge. No blood can possibly be on your hands, because, like other cultists, you reject any negotiation with that which fails to conform with your borrowed ideology. This is the realm of the fantasist, for whom I have no use beyond entertainment. 

Now take a deep breath and read it again -- you&#039;re a seemingly bright enough lot to comprehend the mirror I hold before you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume no safe water, Hilton. But I do find it disturbing that you need to invoke apocalyptic scenarios in order to &#8220;prove&#8221; the efficacy of your suppositions. Al Queda, anyone?</p>
<p>As an exercise in logicical argumentation, your points are useless to debate due to an a priori assumption that no market is ever free enough of &#8220;distortions&#8221; for  your individualist utopia to emerge. No blood can possibly be on your hands, because, like other cultists, you reject any negotiation with that which fails to conform with your borrowed ideology. This is the realm of the fantasist, for whom I have no use beyond entertainment. </p>
<p>Now take a deep breath and read it again &#8212; you&#8217;re a seemingly bright enough lot to comprehend the mirror I hold before you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilton</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4755</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6571#comment-4755</guid>
		<description>Casey you poseur you

You havent argued nor won a single point mate...like a pragmatic politician you&#039;ve assumed you&#039;re in safe water by rehashing tired disproven old crap from Rands enemies who have no valid refutation of her ideas other than slamming her on subjective grounds which cannot be proven nor disproven.

The same counts for your reliance on the collective for moral ammo that proclaims it as being OK and &quot;progressive&quot; to empower other &quot;progressive&quot; politicians to steal from the producers and redistribute the loot on behalf of the say so of the majority, i.e. looters (in exchange for your votes of course)

The reason Rand has so many enemies is that her ideas are making the producers aware of how they are being scammed, and that her ideas have some of them already going on strike against this notion of becoming Milch Cows to the majority..for no reason other than that they are the majority.

Ayn Rand fought for the smallest minority on earth..the individual. This battle should have been won with the collapse of socialism/communism wherever it was implemented, but unfortunately the envy of the looters in regard to those who are more industrious in a free economy were allowed to respawn and mobilise from behind the culturally inherited lie of &quot;the greater public good&quot; (as if the good of some take moral precedence over the good of others)

The revolution to dispose of mob induced slavery has begun, and even though it will take some time, the individual will win. (after all there are so many of you)

Until then as I said...enjoy the ride..it&#039;s almost over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casey you poseur you</p>
<p>You havent argued nor won a single point mate&#8230;like a pragmatic politician you&#8217;ve assumed you&#8217;re in safe water by rehashing tired disproven old crap from Rands enemies who have no valid refutation of her ideas other than slamming her on subjective grounds which cannot be proven nor disproven.</p>
<p>The same counts for your reliance on the collective for moral ammo that proclaims it as being OK and &#8220;progressive&#8221; to empower other &#8220;progressive&#8221; politicians to steal from the producers and redistribute the loot on behalf of the say so of the majority, i.e. looters (in exchange for your votes of course)</p>
<p>The reason Rand has so many enemies is that her ideas are making the producers aware of how they are being scammed, and that her ideas have some of them already going on strike against this notion of becoming Milch Cows to the majority..for no reason other than that they are the majority.</p>
<p>Ayn Rand fought for the smallest minority on earth..the individual. This battle should have been won with the collapse of socialism/communism wherever it was implemented, but unfortunately the envy of the looters in regard to those who are more industrious in a free economy were allowed to respawn and mobilise from behind the culturally inherited lie of &#8220;the greater public good&#8221; (as if the good of some take moral precedence over the good of others)</p>
<p>The revolution to dispose of mob induced slavery has begun, and even though it will take some time, the individual will win. (after all there are so many of you)</p>
<p>Until then as I said&#8230;enjoy the ride..it&#8217;s almost over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: casey</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4753</link>
		<dc:creator>casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6571#comment-4753</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;ve taken away from this little experiment is that arguing w/Objectivists is a bit like arguing with comic store guys about who&#039;s better, Batman or Superman. You just end up getting pulled into their sad, sexless, fantasy-obsessed lives.

That reminds me: C. Jeffery Small&#039;s statement &quot;like the heroes of Rand’s novels, I refuse to sanction you any right to any part of my life,&quot; is actually awesome. Does he wear a cape?

&quot;Like the heroes of the Dragonlance saga, I use my wizard skills to protect all the Noble races of Krynn from the Dragonarmies of Ansalon!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;ve taken away from this little experiment is that arguing w/Objectivists is a bit like arguing with comic store guys about who&#8217;s better, Batman or Superman. You just end up getting pulled into their sad, sexless, fantasy-obsessed lives.</p>
<p>That reminds me: C. Jeffery Small&#8217;s statement &#8220;like the heroes of Rand’s novels, I refuse to sanction you any right to any part of my life,&#8221; is actually awesome. Does he wear a cape?</p>
<p>&#8220;Like the heroes of the Dragonlance saga, I use my wizard skills to protect all the Noble races of Krynn from the Dragonarmies of Ansalon!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/2009/08/the-contrarian-vs-objectivism-round-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4750</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/?p=6571#comment-4750</guid>
		<description>&quot;I defend the rule of law, but fight every effort of the state to regulate our lives.&quot; - C. Jeffery Small

That cracked me up to no end, C. Jeffery Small. I know, I know -  hit me with a 2,000-word essay on what you meant by &quot;the rule of law&quot;, C. Jeffery Small. [Yaawwn.] While you&#039;re at it, get yourself a new name to mentally masturbate by, because C. Jeffery Small ain&#039;t makin&#039; you&#039;re intellectual johnson any bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I defend the rule of law, but fight every effort of the state to regulate our lives.&#8221; &#8211; C. Jeffery Small</p>
<p>That cracked me up to no end, C. Jeffery Small. I know, I know &#8211;  hit me with a 2,000-word essay on what you meant by &#8220;the rule of law&#8221;, C. Jeffery Small. [Yaawwn.] While you&#8217;re at it, get yourself a new name to mentally masturbate by, because C. Jeffery Small ain&#8217;t makin&#8217; you&#8217;re intellectual johnson any bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.thecontrarianmedia.com @ 2012-02-10 15:23:21 -->
