Today is the day you’ve been waiting for, my dear patrons. That’s right, it’s a new nomination for the Fuckwit Librarian of the Year Award!!! It seems to me that 2010 has been somewhat light on eligible candidates. I wonder if our budget worries have taken too much attention away from our normal duties, so we don’t have time to fuckwit it up the way we usually do. Before we get to today’s nomination, however, let’s review the scant field this year:

-The current front-runner is Amanda Marie Cortright, who was busted for stealing almost 1,500 items from the library system she worked for. Cortright was enough of a fuckwit to tweet about reading books she had stolen and use her own email address to set up fake accounts through which she checked out the stolen items. Well done, Fuckwit!

-The only other nomination so far is Me, and that was just a joke. I had run out of barcode labels, you see, and couldn’t add any new items into the catalog for a week and a half. It really wasn’t such a big deal. Oh, and that’s not me in that linked picture. Not yet.

So needless to say, the contest this year is badly in need of excitement. Enter Barbara Wilson of the Birmingham Public Library in Alabama. Here’s the deal: the library Wilson works for, like most libraries, provides computers for patron use. As some of you may have heard, the internet can be used to view pornography. I imagine it would be a rare public institution that provides access to the internet and does not find that access used for looking at naked people. It has happened at my library, though thankfully not when there were any other people around. The thing you have to understand is that as long as the individual viewing the content is of legal age to view said content (the age varies depending on the state you live in), the patron is not breaking any laws. Therefore, unless the library has a policy specifically forbidding the viewing of adult content on their machines, the patron who chooses to do so is within their rights, unless anyone sees what is being viewed and is offended. It’s all about the other library users. The times that I have noticed someone viewing or having viewed adult content at my library have all been times when there was no one else in that part of the library. Except our cat, and she’s not easily offended.

OK, but now I’ve strayed from the point. Wilson works at a library, and people were looking at porn on the computers. Wilson’s lawyer says the patrons would “engage in acts of public lewdness,” and that they would “become belligerent when they (were) approached about it.” Wilson is suing the Library for “creating a sexually hostile work environment.” (I must note that if the acts of lewdness violated local statutes, the police should have called, and the situation dealt with by them, not the librarians. That said, if the lewdness was the viewing of content, read on…)

So the first thing Wilson got wrong is thinking that what the patrons choose to access has anything to do with us or our personal feelings about any content. Certainly, many librarians would be offended by images they see patrons viewing online, but it is not up to us what content people choose to view or how, as long as they are keeping within the limits of the law.

Second, it is not Wilson’s employer who is creating the hostile environment. Providing access to computers and the internet does not mean you are telling people to look at porn. It is the decisions of the patrons that Wilson is bothered by, not the fact that the library provides access. Wilson clearly does not understand that the whole point of libraries is to provide access to whatever content the users may require, for whatever reason they may have. It is not up to us to decide what is right or wrong for the individuals or the community. If you don’t get, you are clearly a fuckwit.

Congratulations, Barbara! You’re a contender!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TL3oaHKCko

I’ve got some awesome news on that front.

The CDs have been assembled by Mars Pyramid and are on the way to Contrarian HQ. The inimitable Susan Norton has turned in the comic that comes with the purchase of the physical copy of the album. The liner notes have been written and the lyrics pieced together. All that’s left are the videos (and probably a podcast where I explain what a tremendous pain in the ass it is to do this stuff, but also why it’s fun and rewarding). Look for an official rollout within the next couple of weeks.

But it’s not all about me, me, me. I’ve decided, after six or so solo releases (at least two of which have been successful by modest standards), to put out some stuff by other artists.

Lux Eterna is the name of the label, and the next release will be from classically-trained experimental-Americana guitarist Mark G. Cooley, who has decided to go electric on his new recording. (Go ahead, scream “Judas!” — it always feels good.) So what does this as-yet-unnamed album sound like? Picture Discipline-era King Crimson as played by technicolor gnomes from another dimension and you’re almost there. There’s lots of cool shimmers and shudders for all you noise addicts, too. In other words, something for everyone.

Next, I hope to collaborate on a pop song cycle with Arthur Adams. I’ve long wanted to compose an album in tribute to weirdo rocket scientist Jack Whiteseide Parsons in which bygone California — in all of its bootstrapping, schizophrenic glory — serves as a musical lodestone. Last time I checked with Arthur, he was down. All the way down, even.

After (or perhaps before) that, I hope to release something from The Ten Thousand Things, whom readers will know as our resident Library Scientist, Wes Covey.

By the way, my short story “The Cove,” which was featured as a digital extra for my last record, Eldritch Musicks, is published in the latest edition of Fantastic Horror #16. You can read it online, even.

As you were.

Hi there, library lovers. I feel bad that I haven’t had much to say lately, but unfortunately there isn’t much nice to say. Libraries are still having our budgets gutted, and some of us are getting a little tired of the battle. Libraries (unfortunately) can’t exist simply as caves in which librarians can live out our information dream-lives. We need funding to stay open, and pay to keep doing the job. Don’t nobody want to pay taxes, but the value of an educated public and plowed roads (for those of us who live in Soon-To-Be-Snowville) is too great not to pay. But I’m not going to talk about that anymore, because it makes me sad and angry. These pictures were taken of me while I wrote those first few sentences:

(Note: those aren’t me, except maybe the guy third from the left on the bottom. He might be me.)

When I think about libraries, I’m usually the second guy on the left, in the top row. Sometimes even the woman below him. Lately I’m the one on the lower right, and that’s off-putting for the lady who’s looking for Coming Home by Rosamund Pilcher.

So, instead of wetting your screens with my tears, I’m going to focus on some less-serious matters.

Actually the first one is quite serious, and involves The Contrarian Media being plagiarized by one of the world’s largest media outlets. Well, ok, that’s not quite true, but still, check this out: you all remember my post last month about the history of crashes? You know, the one that made you ask yourselves exactly how mentally healthy the average Contrarian staffer is? (Answer: the average is the guy third form the left on the bottom row. You know, the one who might be me.) Well, that post was published on July 28th, more than two weeks before this article on the BBC. I admit the author did a little more research than I did, and that his article corrects some errors in my information, so I suppose I will accept the article as a correction and not carry on with any recourse. Oh, also, I would have no legal standing.

Let’s move on. I know what you all really want to read about: men in tights. I found this article a few weeks ago on Wired Magazine‘s GeekDad blog. The brief piece focuses on a question posed by psychologist and professor Sharon Lamb. Lamb asks whether or not the comic books (and related movies) being published (or produced) these days are harmful to children: “Today’s superhero is too much like an action hero who participates in non-stop violence; he’s aggressive, sarcastic and rarely speaks to the virtue of doing good for humanity.” Lamb, echoing the infamous beliefs of Fredric Wertham, argues that the young male comic readers of our time are being forced to decide between adopting an identity of either shallow macho pseudo-manhood or lazy, unengaged slacker. Now I admit that we, as a culture, should be more mindful about what we are feeding to the brains of our children, and I’m the first one in line when it comes to reimagining gender stereotypes. That said, Lamb is missing a major point: while there are many comic books and graphic novels being written for kids, a fair number of the books she’s speaking of, and the movies made from them, are written for adults. Comic books long ago shifted away from being an item for the enjoyment of the young, and are now focusing on far more grown-up issues. The problem isn’t the fact that contemporary comics are too violent or intense, the problem is that lazy parents don’t bother to look into the difference between Justice League Unlimited or Amelia Rules and Grant Morrison‘s recent Batman books. Is a ten-year-old boy going to understand the messages of Watchmen, whether in book or film form? Doubtful. Did comic-god and magician Alan Moore intend kids to read his book? Also doubtful. It’s time to realize that, as opposed to blaming the comics industry, we need to learn about stepping stones between Garfield and Irredeemable. Parents, try Jarrett Krosoczka‘s Lunch Lady and the League of Librarians, though admittedly you may need to explain to your kids that not all librarians are evil (only some) and that not all of us want to destroy video games.

That’ll do for this installment, patrons. Live well, talk to your local government about funding your library, and talk to your kids about what they read. We’ll get through the hard times together…

I have failed you, dear readers. I promised to journey into the heart of Glennbeckistan for “Restoring Honor,” or “Whitestock,” or “The Greatest Affront to American Ideals in History,” or whatever you wanna call it. Instead, I ended up watching it on C-SPAN and monitoring real-time reactions on Twitter.

The following was repurposed from my various statements made elsewhere; it should suffice as ongoing documentation of Our National Shame. (For extra credit, I implore you to read this lengthy but important article about how the Tea Party movement is underwritten by the elitist world-destroyers at Koch Industries.)

Lincoln Memorial, The National Mall, Washington, D.C., 8.28.10

“When fascism comes to America, it will come wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”
-Sinclair Lewis

“Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity”.
-Martin Luther King, Jr.

Insane in the Membrane

One thing to understand right off the bat: there was not a single word of substance uttered at “Restoring Honor.” Yet the various speeches and pre-recorded video segments transcended your average jingoism and entered the realm of tailored mindwashing. Overall, the event had all the hallmarks of carefully staged cult propaganda. That it took place on the anniversary of the most stirring call to American virtue in our nation’s history is even more appalling.

Think I’m exaggerating about the cult aspects?

If you listen closely (but not too close!), you’ll hear elements of Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) in both the live and canned oratory. NLP is the get-rich-quick scam version of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), which is actually sound science. CBT is simply the Western scientific confirmation of neurological plasticity, which has been beneficently described by Buddhists for many centuries. Buddhist practitioners employ certain techniques to their own minds to transform delusional thinking into an holistic comprehension of impermanence. Since thoughts are squirrelly and their origins not always obvious, there’s an emphasis on stillness so that the turbulent mind can settle and its essential characteristics considered. At this point, an experienced meditator can perceive subtle cognition without becoming attached to any single idea, concept or emotion. After a while, new thought patterns are established and existential strife is greatly diminished.

That’s the healthy, self-directed version.

In the West, similar strategies are used by Cognitive Behavioral Therapists to ameliorate the effects of certain pathologies in their patients. NLP, on the other hand, is endorsed by skeevy marketing dudes as a way to get gullible people to buy stuff. The former is a legitimate branch of neurophysiology, the latter a cargo cult science.

In mindwashing, the idea is to enhance a target’s susceptibility to a given idea or concept. Even before Scientology or pyramid marketing, political operatives and tent revivalists made surprisingly effective use semantic suggestion. Applied skillfully, those with positional power can plant rhetorical, emotional or ideological “seeds” with the subconscious permission of the receiver. To succeed, the operator must have a sense of the target’s value set and informational capacities.

It’s like the old-fashioned Jedi mind trick: softer noggins are the most susceptible, as are those under stress or experiencing collective turmoil. Clearly, the Tea Party is low hanging fruit. In the absence of once-stable ideological constructs (like manufactured consumer consent based on free market fantasies), these folks are putty in the hands of even a marginally-gifted communicator like Beck.

Josef Goebbels was adept exploiting these phenomena. Sarah Palin and her ilk get it. Barack Obama seemingly doesn’t.

Welcome to Bizzaro World

“Restoring Honor” was positively Orwellian; a true exercise in doublespeak. Up is down, left is right, bigotry is tolerance, aggression is compassion, reality is what they say it is, facts be damned. I mean, to not-so-subtly imply that the Framers were proponents of organized Christianity, and that Martin Luther King, Jr. would endorse the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq? Wow.

It’s not honor that needs restoring in this country, it’s a basic understanding of our history.

First of all, America was not intended to be a nation with fealty to either Rome or the Protestant Church of Europe. That’s the reason for the clearly articulated separation of Church and State, which has steadily eroded ever since the GOP made its pact with the Moral Majority and exiled the last conservative intellectual, William F. Buckley. Hey, didja know that Ronald Reagan — that camera-ready darling of the Religious Right — attended church far less than Obama, and regularly consulted soothsayers? Good thing he had cover from evangelicals in exchange for giving wedge issues a spotlight in the national discourse. Which turned out to be a great way to distract Americans from the hollowing out of the public sphere and the dismantling of the US labor market.

But back to our Founders. These fellas were hardly the kinds of Christians Pat Robertson would recognize. Most were Enlightenment-inspired Masonic Deists with radical notions of Liberty, Fraternity and Equality borrowed from the French, of all people. (For various reasons, the French Revolution came later; they had a far worse go of it).

Some of the Founders’ statements about Christianity are so brash that Palin, Beck, et. al would find them nothing short of heretical. Here’s a taste:

“I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved — the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced.”
-John Adams

“The United States is in no way founded upon the Christian religion.”
-George Washington

“I have examined all the known superstitions of the world, and I do not find in our particular superstition of Christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites; to support roguery and error all over the earth.”
-Thomas Jefferson

“I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies.”
-Ben Franklin

Even the Great Emancipator, whose marble effigy provided the backdrop to Whitestock, was unambiguous:

“The Bible is not my Book and Christianity is not my religion.“
-Abraham Lincoln

If you watched the rally, you’d have thought that these guys conceived the country as the first megachurch.

Glenn Beck is hardly an exemplar of Christ-like behavior. More like “Who Would Jesus Kill?” Apparently, the answer to that is Michael Moore. Here’s some Beck-style “honor” from 2005:

“I’m thinking about killing Michael Moore, and I’m wondering if I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it… No, I think I could. I think he could be looking me in the eye, you know, and I could just be choking the life out. Is this wrong? I stopped wearing my What Would Jesus Do wristband, and I’ve lost all sense of right and wrong now. I used to be able to say, ‘Yeah, I’d kill Michael Moore,’ and then I’d see the little band: What Would Jesus Do? And then I’d realize, ‘Oh, you wouldn’t kill Michael Moore. Or at least you wouldn’t choke him to death.’ And you know, well, I’m not sure.”

You didn’t hear any of that kind of talk at the rally. But you did hear from MLK’s niece, a notorious campaigner against the rights of homosexuals, trotted out to demonstrate the Tea Party’s deep commitment to social justice. For everyone that isn’t gay. Or Muslim. Or willing to consider secular solutions to problems perpetuated by right-wing corporatocracy.

I saw a comment on a prominent liberal blog calling the Beck event “a proto-facist rally to mobilize the brownshirts in defense of the fatherland.” While I’m not sure I’d go that far, the “support the troops” part of the show was completely out-of-step with the MLK-lauding. Unsurprisingly, it was Palin who tried to make the connection between the civil rights leader and those brave men and women who defend our nation. Here’s a response from that same liberal blog commenter: “Anybody who thinks King would have supported the current War on Terror really should read his wonderful 1967 anti-Vietnam war speech he gave at the Riverside church in Harlem. Is the military under attack? You’d think Obama was proposing to disband all branches of the armed services, the way Beck and Palin are carrying on.”

Reparation Nation

Having recently lost advertisers over having called the president a racist, Beck likely needed to put a more inclusive spin on his standard bile. But holding a funtime rally where fear-addled white folks can hear how Jesus is colorblind won’t magically erase the many things Beck has said about the threat of African-Socialist-Muslim enslavement. Here’s a few choice quotes you may have missed:

“This guy is not who he says he is. None of his bills, none of his proposals are about what he says they’re about. The health care bill is reparations. It’s the beginning of reparations. He’s going to give — if you want to go into medical school, the medical schools will get more federal dollars if they have proven that they are putting minorities ahead.”

“When the president was sitting there, or standing there, and he was talking about Native American rights in the middle of a tragedy, Fort Hood, it didn’t feel right. And it seemed, maybe to me, that he was even promising reparations.”

“Everything that is getting pushed through Congress, including this health care bill, are transforming America. And they are all driven by President Obama’s thinking on one idea: reparations… These massive programs are Obama brand reparations — or in presidential speak, leveling out the playing field. But, just in case the universalness of the program doesn’t somehow or another quench his reparation appetite, he is making sure to do his part to pay the debt in the other areas.”

“You were voting for — not change, but change, I think, in race. You were like ‘Hey, let’s put this behind us.’ I think a lot of people were there. They weren’t necessarily for his policies because his policies and everything else are — what are they?”

I don’t care how many persons of color you trotted out at your event, Glenn. What you’re saying is clear: the scary black man in the White House is coming to take your stuff and redistribute it to minorities.

All of this offends me deeply, because I’m a Patriot. I patriotically defend Americans from the forces of bigotry and ignorance. I patriotically defend those who are unable or unwilling to see how they are being manipulated from being preyed upon for profit. I patriotically defend the right for Americans to be non-religious. I patriotically defend Americans’ right to self-determination and to reject coercion by corporations that seek to limit individual choice and shirk civic responsibility. I patriotically defend Americans from state intervention in the sexual and reproductive decisions of adults. Most importantly, I patriotically defend Americans’ right to pursue happiness and contribute to the advancement of the ideals that made this country great.

I hope you will start calling yourselves Patriots: loudly, proudly and often.

Happy birthday, Elizabeth B!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=oloFLyel3Is

Hat tip to MGP.

Southern pride, as foreign to a Northerner as boiled peanuts and hush puppies, is reflected everywhere: shop windows, truck stops and front porches. Dixie devotion takes many forms, but most common are Confederate flags, military icons and other relics of a war fought — and lost — nearly 200 years ago.

The South itself is a living, breathing tribute to the War of Northern Aggression – it shapes the contours of daily life, from politics to religion to social custom.

In a part of America so enthralled with its own history and traditions, a visitor might be surprised that the South is relatively modern in design. Such cities as Columbia, South Carolina, Raleigh/Durham North Carolina and Atlanta, Georgia boast some of the most contemporary architecture and layout as you’re likely to encounter in the States. The reason is simple: a guy named General William Sherman burned most of the original stuff to the ground.

Sherman wreaked havoc on the American South. His “March to the Sea” left landscapes devastated, families broken and torn, and upended the Confederate economy, choking the last ounce of breath out of America’s Old South. He left a burning path behind him for miles, torching any and every town and village he came upon — including the now-gleaming metropolis of Atlanta.

There remains a major anomaly to this New South, a curious relic that rests along Georgia’s short seacoast: the city of Savannah. For one reason or another, Savannah seems frozen in time. Journeying downtown is like stepping out of Doc Brown’s DeLorean. Here, visitors find themselves surrounded by some of the nation’s oldest and most cherished homes – antebellum dwellings that owe their existences to early 19th century preservation efforts. Just about every downtown building is a historical site – each one with a plaque on the outside along with cornerstone proof of date of erection and principal owner.

Did Sherman’s march to the sea not make it to the coastline? As matter of fact, the General occupied Savannah for a lengthy period of time. Yet the pyromaniacal Yank spared the city the throws of his torch. The city was left intact.

But why?

Some believe that Sherman spared Savannah because of its breathtaking beauty. Others claim that when he saw the slaves of Savannah willing to protect the city without the master’s orders, he recognized it as a emblem of potential Southern virtue. Both explanations seem a bit dramatic. According to a friendly local with whom I spoke during a visit last month, the local politicians invited Sherman and his men into the city, greeted the tired and starving Northern soldiers as brothers and stayed flame-free as a return favor.

The people and culture of Savannah were also left largely un-violated. An odd and eclectic group, Savannah citizens take pride in their traditions, and sport antiquated seersucker suits, top hats and throwback facial hair. The women honor the past through mannerisms, dress, and courtesies more Scarlet O’ Hara than Scarlett Johannssen. Horses trot up and down the original cobblestone streets, and the old Southern way of life remains intact — even if it is just for show.

Savannah’s attempt to preserve its past encompasses all aspects of Southern life — and Southern death.

When you visit the city, be sure to skip the ghost tour trolleys along the cobblestone. And don’t be alarmed if you happen upon a Confederate soldier in one of the many beautiful garden squares that dot the historic district — it’s just a SCAD student earning a few extra bucks as a ghost tour guide. It might seem weird that everyone gabbers of ghosts, spooks, haints and even murderous phantoms, but it’s perfectly normal for them.

It’s just Savannah being Savannah. Preserving its past in a celebration of the paranormal.

A short while ago, my wife and I packed up the car and took off for the coastal city; our second visit in the ten years we’ve been carpetbagging the South. I made it my personal goal to dine in and visit as many legendary haunted locations as possible throughout Savannah. Although we couldn’t get a room at TheMarshall House – a large, restored hotel in the center of town with an entire floor plagued by a murderous and terrifying presence, we did get to eat at The Olde Pink House — the former home of a Confederate captain that’s now a fine dining establishment. The food is marvelous, as are the tales of ghosts that haunt the basement pub. Many employees claim to have seen the apparitions of two Confederate soldiers saddling up to the bar for a sniff of brandy. Also, the former owner, apparently disgusted with the feminine color of his house, has been known to tug at any pink apparel in the joint. Ourwaiter, a three year veteran of the restaurant, said that, while he’d never seen the ghosts, every so often a female diner would report on her clothes being pulled at while in the bathroom. But to his recollection, nothing has been experienced by any employee firsthand during his time there.

Next stop was Moon River Brewery — a staple for locals. This would be the place I could see myself and friends relaxing after a day of work, escaping the tourists, and imbibing the delicious brew (try the aptly-named “Apparition”). The Moon River Brewery’s ghostly past has been cemented by the folks over at TAPS, who glimpsed evidence of a shadowy figure moving behind a pool table in a far corner of its lower level — a place where they admitted that no door was present (meaning that a forgery would have to pass in front of the camera). So I went to the location, found the pool table… and the hidden door against the wall leading to another room. Disappointed, I told my wife as the folks at the neighboring table asked our waiter if they could go downstairs and say “hi” to the friendly ghost seen on “Ghost Hunters.” My wife and I shrugged our soldiers and continued our meal.

The rest of our weekend was similar. We stopped at all the hot spots and inquired of employees’ experiences. Most replies began the same way: “Well, I’ve never experienced something but I heard that one time…”

Our last stop on our “Haunt Jaunt” in Savannah was the one that I will remember. The Owens-Thomas House is one of the oldest and best-preserved homes in the city. The main building is immaculate and beautiful, a stunning depiction of antebellum affluence. Beyond the spot where guides greet guests are the slave quarters, which have remained practically untouched in almost 200 years. Here lay the relics of a nearly-forgotten past: slave tools behind glass cases, financial records of human trade in the corner and an old blanket draped over a a rickety chair.

The first thing our guide pointed out was the ceiling. It was painted by the slaves — the same hands of those who worked the house — and has never been altered or restored. The color they chose: an original hue they called “Haint Blue.”

The slaves believed that this color kept wicked spirits from infiltrating their own world. It acted as a barrier between them and the twisted wills of the long departed.

Beneath this azure cover they would lie in the freezing seaside cold fearing the unseen and unconquerable hands of forces they could not resist — the only protection being a thin layer of paint and an even thinner layer of hope.

As we toured the main house, I marveled at the elevated bridge inside, was dazzled by gold pieces and color-schemed rooms honoring foreign dignitaries, and took in the elegance of another time. Still, my mind constantly went back to the untouched ceiling in the slave house.

Because the hands that painted that ceiling are the true spirits that haunt Savannah and many other parts of the American South. And all the opulence and wealth cannot cover it up.

Ultimately, the ghosts and spirit stories told to preserve a link to Savannah’s past haunt the city far less than the fading ceiling paint in a small building behind the Owens-Thomas House.

Easily the catchiest exercise in r&b irreverence since “Crazy.”

Now to be a real Debbie Downer! Here are some stats on the Gaza blockade, which has been in effect for the past three years. Perhaps most relevant are the food shortages: not only are 61 percent of Gazans “foods insecure,” but 80 percent of homes are dependent on food aid. Moreover, one third of children under five and women of childbearing age suffer from anemia, according to the World Health Organization. Although Abergil may be unaware of this fact, electronic items, including computers, are generally denied entry into Gaza.

Hey, at least the men with whom she posed will be spared the further humiliation of an virtual reunion with their captor. And you thought it sucked getting Facebook requests from those horrible people you went to high school with…

Where would an Israeli soldier get the idea that this was kosher? That it’s perfectly okay preen and pose with prisoners for your own amusement? Well, here in the U.S., college age kids are known to invade Mexican border towns over spring break, where they take pictures of themselves mock-raping inflatable burros, downing shots and snapping pics of insecure girls flashing their breasts. Pathetic, sure, but less legally damning.

Then there was Abu Ghraib, back in 2004. Remember those Iraqi prisoner abuse pics, memorably featuring a then-twenty-one-year-old Lynndie England? To her credit, Eden Abergil didn’t post any shots of her holding a leash attached to a naked, crawling man. She does not make the thumbs up sign behind human pyramids. There are no snaphots of her leering at men being forced to masturbate.

Moreover, there’s no evidence that Abergil did it to please a man, unlike England, who happily posed for the enjoyment of her now ex-boyfriend, Charles Graner In a half-assed defense of her reprehensible behavior, England remarked to an interviewer, “I didn’t want them. But he was so persistent. Go on! Just for me! If you loved me, you’d do it. I’m like, gee, OK just take the damned picture.”

I suppose it’s somewhat comforting to know that Abergil probably didn’t take her pictures for some fella’s titillation. Perhaps there’s more gender equality in a country with universal conscription. Sisters are doin’ it for themselves!

When Abergil was asked about the harm Israel’s international reputation could face as a result of her actions, she protested, “We will always be attacked. Whatever we do, we will always be attacked.”  For Abergil, the Geneva Conventions (to which Israel is a signatory) are major a killjoy when she’s having “the best time of my life” (as her IDF Facebook album is labeled).

There’s nothing wrong with violating international human rights standards of the people you’re occupying. It’s just good, healthy fun when you’re young.